Send us Feedback

Thursday02 September 2010

Are fuel cells the future of heating?

  • Email
  • Comments (4)
  • Save

Pamela Buxton looks at planned London office projects by SOM and Wilkinson Eyre that will use this sustainable method of generating heat and power

The UK has been lagging behind the US, Japan and Germany in applying fuel cell technology to buildings. But with increasing legislation to cut carbon emissions, this is changing.

Two projects in London, SOM’s Arrowhead development on the Isle of Dogs for Ballymore, and three buildings for Aldgate Place in Whitechapel, by Wilkinson Eyre for Tishman Speyer, are set to derive up to 10% of their energy needs from fuel cells.

David Stillman of DSA Engineering, the services engineer behind both these office projects, reckons these will be followed by many more in the not-so-distant future. “Ten to 15 years from now, every single new building will be powered by fuel cells,” he says. “It’s the magic bullet — until we get fusion power going.”

This anticipated adoption of fuel cell technology to power buildings is partly due to the requirement under the London Plan for all new commercial buildings to cut carbon emissions by 20%, on top of fulfiling Part L requirements. Now developers have to take sustainability seriously to gain planning permission, making fuel cell technology’s ability to convert chemical energy to electrical energy all the more attractive, despite the greater capital expense.

Expensive solution

“Some technologies are more carbon-efficient than others,” says Stillman. “Fuel cells are two-and-a-half times more carbon-efficient than a conventional CHP plant. It’s the best solution. It’s also the most expensive solution.”

Contrarily, both the Arrowhead and Aldgate Place projects had to get special permission from the Greater London Authority to allow fuel cells to count towards carbon reduction — because fuel cells aren’t recognised as renewables in the London Plan.

For the 26-storey Arrowhead scheme, the design team had originally been keen to use the building’s dockside location at South Quay for ground water cooling, but this became less attractive because of Environment Agency restrictions on the temperature of discharged water, and only short licences were available to use the water in this way. Fuel cells were less problematic.

Stillman has recommended a UTC Power 500kW Pure Cell fuel cell box for both buildings. At Arrowhead, this will provide 10% of the 50,000sq m building’s energy consumption, producing 250kW of electricity and 250kW of heat. As well as contributing 24 hours a day — it runs continuously — to the supply of electricity, and to space and water heating, the fuel cells help cool the building through an absorption chiller.

The fuel cells are housed in a 5m x 4m box some 3m high which will be located in the basement of the Arrowhead building. The cells run on hydrogen but will be powered initially using mains gas — which is 75% hydrogen — since no easily available hydrogen supply yet exists. They extract the hydrogen from the gas and convert it into electrical energy (see box). Water vapour, the waste product, can be extracted out of the building.

Maintenance is minimal, but every 10 years the box needs a new stack of fuel cells, and would need to be replaced in its entirety after 25 years. Its installation in the basement also has advantages for the developer in that it does not take up rentable space, places no physical constraints on future tenants, and has low operating costs.

At Arrowhead, the fuel cell will be part of a broader sustainability strategy, which includes a twin-skinned facade. SOM director Kent Jackson is hoping that the building, which has been built to basement level, will go ahead although the current economic climate is slowing it down.

“The client is very committed to making a good name for itself in terms of sustainability,” he says. “But for the building to go forward, a tenant is needed.”

Fuel cells are two-and-a-half times more carbon-efficient than a conventional CHP plant

 

Stillman, who has two toy cars powered by fuel cells in his office, is gung-ho about the application of fuel cell technology in buildings. “It’s not even the future, it’s now,” he says.

If he is right, then fuel cells in buildings will be no flash in the pan, leading in time to a hydrogen infrastructure network that will improve efficiency by enabling fuel cells to work directly off mains hydrogen.

Arrowhead

Credit: Miller Hare Limited

Arrowhead

Sustainability at Arrowhead

Facade The proposed 26-storey Arrowhead development features a highly glazed twin-skinned facade that will help provide comfortable internal conditions year-round through a low-energy design.

In extreme temperatures, some heat build-up will occur within the facade. Heat is removed to prevent excessive temperatures adversely affecting the cooling systems. This is done by venting the facade cavity at every level with thin strips of high- and low-level vents.

Fuel cell The scheme also features fuel cell technology for heating and ventilation.

Photovoltaics Ten square metres of photovoltaics will be fixed to the roof. This will contribute to 0.1% of energy together with PIR (infrared) detection, which temporarily switches on lights in stairwells and other back-of-house areas where they are normally turned off.

Algate Place

Algate Place

Sustainability at Aldgate Place

Solar shading The glazing will incorporate solar shading in the form of brises soleil, and all three buildings will feature fuel cell technology for heating and ventilation.

Fuel cells Two fuel cells will provide a total of 400kW of electricity and 500kW of water heating. The hot water will be used either for heating in winter or for generating absorption cooling in summer.

Oliver Tyler, director at Wilkinson Eyre, says: “The key advantage at Aldgate, where we might have a phased development, is that fuel cells come in modules and are linearly expandable.

Fuel cells act like a CHP plant in that they produce both heat and electricity.”

How fuel cells work

Fuel cells are having quite a moment both inside the construction industry and out. In April, Boeing flew the first manned aeroplane powered by hydrogen fuel cells. In June, Honda began making the world’s first commercially available fuel cell car, and soon this technology is set to be applied to commercial buildings in the UK.

Despite this recent flurry of activity, fuel cell technology has been around for some time. Invented back in 1839 by British scientist and barrister William Grove, its useful application only began in the 1950s once Nasa saw its potential for space missions and began investing in its development.

The fuel cell works by converting chemical energy to electrical energy. It does this by using a catalyst — often platinum, which is one of the reasons for fuel cells’ expense — to separate a fuel into its component electrons and protons. The electrons then flow through a circuit
to create an electric current. These recombine with the protons and with an oxidant to produce a waste product which is released through vapour.

Many combinations of fuels and oxidants are possible, but the most common is hydrogen combined with oxygen — which produces water as
the waste product.

The process also generates heat which can be used to warm up water or air. Cells operate continuously with a fuel supply, but need to be replaced after between five and 10 years. As the process is electrochemical rather than based on combustion, it is clean, quiet and far more efficient than burning fuel.

Cells are frequently used for industrial and military buildings in the US, and also on some commercial buildings. The first use of fuel cell technology on a UK building was in 2003, when Woking Borough Council retrofitted a leisure centre with a 200kW fuel cell — the UK’s first — and exported surplus electricity to other council sites.

Transport for London is also hoping to install a fuel cell at its Palestra offices in London.

See graphic attached

Related company resources

Readers' comments (4)

  • Dear Mr/Ms., How many kw/h electro energy will be produced 1 kg H2?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It seems that we are getting ever more desperate as more and more of the worlds governments and knowledgeable populations admit defeat in the face of global warming and energy depletion 10% on a new heavily glazed office building is a bit of a joke isn't it? Also, there is something about the 'pertpetual motion machine' in the way that fuel cells are characterised in the media. What the article above fails to mention (as most common articles on this subject do), is that as well as a catalyst, you need energy to split the gas into protons and electrons. It desn't happen by magic (perhaps this is the reason that it is not classified as a renewable. So basically these offices will be the built environment equivalent of the Toyota Prius, with the fuel cell being a sort of battery (as the name suggests). Even with all the advances in technology we've made over the years as a species, you still (to my knowledge) can't get something for nothing. It's really not a very exciting development in terms the problems we face

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fuel Cells are an excellent idea, and should eb given major tax incentives to promote their use, and consequently drive their cost down and create a competitive market for sustainable energies - which is lacking presently. Note also that those who say we "can't get something for nothing" are the same people who are keeping power stations powered by coal and cars by oil. A little optimism and imagination wouldn't go amiss.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's certainly valuable to have as many viable options as possible for achieveing emissions savings in building energy use, but it seems to me fuel cells suffer from the same disadvantages as engine-based CHP, it's just that the inefficiencies are an acceptable loss. The article doesn't say how 250kW of heat is used continuously in an office block - I suspect a fair amount is thrown away (one of the acceptable losses!) Clearly a big chunk of the gas used is thrown away too and why is the water ditched? With this sort of investment anyway, wouldn't a non-potable tank have been sensible? Fuel cells certainly have their place but a magic bullet? I think not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register
  • Email
  • Comments (4)
  • Save