facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Feedback

Thursday31 July 2014

Stirling judges break with tradition

  • Email
  • Comments (7)
  • Save

Judges worked alongside awards panel to compile 2012 shortlist

Judges for this year’s Stirling Prize were involved in helping draw up the shortlisted buildings for the first time.

In previous editions of the UK’s most famous architecture award, the judges’ role has been confined to deciding the winner from the shortlist handed to them.

But in a break from tradition, this year’s five judges, chaired by Nicholas Grimshaw and including Joanna van Heyningen and former V&A director Mark Jones, were all included in the process that whittled down the shortlist from the 59 schemes eligible to the six named earlier this week.

The judges worked alongside the dozen strong awards panel chaired by Deborah Saunt and which included Design Council Cabe director Paul Finch and Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios partner Peter Clegg.

A RIBA spokeswoman said the five judges attended the awards group meeting which selected the final shortlist. She added: “It gives them a proper understanding of the process and the rationale behind the shortlist. [The awards] get refined over time and we review how we run them every year in order to make them the best we can.”

One source said: “In the past, the judges were presented with the shortlist but wouldn’t know why this school had been shortlisted alongside this arts complex. Doing it this way is an improvement.”

Among the schemes shortlisted is 5 New Court – better known as the Rothschild’s building – in the City of London by OMA and Allies and Morrison.

New Court, London, OMA with Allies and Morrison

New Court, London, OMA with Allies and Morrison, odds (4/1)

It was championed by the City’s chief planning officer Peter Rees in the face of considerable opposition and this week he told BD: “It is always pleasing to hear that a commercial building has made it onto the shortlist. Architecture prizes have long favoured buildings for the arts, specially commissioned homes and projects for charitable purposes.”

He added its nomination was a vindication for the bank which has been on the same site since 1809 and rebuilt its headquarters twice already.

“Rothschild’s have shown great confidence through commissioning an internationally regarded architect to produce a strong architectural statement specified to last for a life of 150 years,” he added. “We are short of patrons and architecture of this calibre.”

The full shortlist and their odds*

  • Hepworth Gallery, Wakefield, David Chipperfield (3/1)
  • Sainsbury Laboratory, Cambridge, Stanton William (7/2)
  • Lyric Theatre, Belfast, O’Donnell & Tuomey (4/1)
  • New Court, London, OMA with Allies and Morrison (4/1)
  • Maggie’s Centre, Glasgow, OMA (9/2)
  • London Olympic Stadium by Populous (5/1)

* Odds supplied by William Hill

Share

Readers' comments (7)

  • kamiichi

    How can you nominate the Olympic Stadium without experiencing it in action?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Kamiichi is right; and perhaps in future years the Stirling should only be open to buildings that have been operating satisfactorily for a year.
    On a related subject, it seems that there are thousands of seats around the diving pool from which it is not possible to see the diving board (Today's Times pp 66-67) - wonder if that featured in the brief!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Kamiichi - I agree.

    It highlights how superficial the award is.

    Surely a more worthwhile honour to bestow would be 'best building 10 years after completion'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • odds.... for an award that those in the know know whos going to win it anyway! i'll be watching for the finger tapping on the back slapping :) Oh, no i wont, its not on tv!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • zecks_marquise

    @ Rod - that is the 'building for life award'

    school = evelyn grace
    art gallery = neues museum

    result = travesty

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yoshiwara is correct that the Populous stadium is an inappropriate contender.

    But neither is the disjointed Rothschild HQ a great building.

    But if the rumour that Dame Zaha is holding back her swimming pool until the inconvenient spectator seating is removed, I hope the building is disqualified next year on a trumped-up technicality.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Although the judges weren't previously responsible for compiling the shortlist, they have always had the power of adding to the list as per the British library (1998) and Museum of Scotland (1999)

    Interesting that the judges don't include the previous years' prize winner, a member from the sponsor or the RIBA President as was the initial idea.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register
  • Email
  • Comments (7)
  • Save
Latest
News
Sign in

Email Newsletters

Sign out to login as another user

I'm searching for in
Desktop Site | Mobile Site