facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Feedback

Tuesday22 August 2017

MPs investigating Garden Bridge question need for scheme

  • Email
  • Comments (33)
  • Save

Chair of public accounts committee slams Treasury over lack of proper business case

The head of the Public Accounts Committee has questioned the need for the Garden Bridge and slammed the government for failing to provide a rigorous analysis of the business case for the project.

In a letter to the Treasury’s permanent secretary Tom Scholar, dated yesterday (14 December), public accounts committee chair Meg Hillier MP called the project an “extravagant solution” to the need to link Temple Station on the north bank of the Thames with the Southbank.

She added that suggested journey time savings and health benefits from the project “seem entirely tenuous”.

Hillier called funding for the project “inherently risky” and said there were “significant risks” involved with the scheme.

She added that she “remain concerned about the risk to taxpayers’ money and the commitments that were made to underwrite the project if it is cancelled”.

It comes after the committee asked the Treasury to provide it with an analysis of the Garden Bridge business case.

The committee subsequently received an analysis from a Treasury official by email on 17 November, but Hillier said it was “not clear from the note, which was not on headed paper or page numbered” if this was something that Scholar had signed off.

She said that the conclusion from the document said government ministers believe the Garden Bridge has a “reasonable prospect” of delivering value for money, but added: “I fail to understand how such an optimistic conclusion could be reached on delivering value for money.”

Hillier called for the Treasury to provide an analysis of the Garden Bridge business case “rather than a statement of facts and a commentary”.

The Garden Bridge Trust declined to comment, explaining: “The Trust was set up at the request of the TfL to deliver the project and we won’t comment on historical issues that happened before our time.”

Share

Readers' comments (33)

  • Sounds as good as the Business Case for Brexit.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bin it, and send Joanna Lumley the bill for the money wasted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a farce.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's a good job the same aerial slide riding, tousled hair, joke politician who avidly promoted the garden bridge isn't a key player in formulating Brexit strategy....oh wait.



    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Munter Roe

    The people have spoken.
    The democratic will of the people will be enforced.
    Believe.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Some sense at last. Hope it's not too late...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Great letter from Meg Hillier

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Andrew Jones

    Ah, Munter... that mantra, again.

    Just for the sake of those of us losing the will to live, what is it that we're supposed to believe it? Since the wonderful plan will remain secret for the foreseeable, what fairyland nonsense are we to 'believe' in the meantime?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Did your free crumpets and bunting not arrive yet Andrew?

    @Munter

    Repeating something doesn't make it true.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @cthululu

    repeating something doesn't make it true ??

    tell the world media that !!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register
  • Email
  • Comments (33)
  • Save
Latest
News
Sign in

Email Newsletters

Sign out to login as another user

Desktop Site | Mobile Site